Embryonic Stem Cells for Research- Right or Wrong

Embryonic Stem Cells for Research- Right or Wrong in that location have been a lot of controversies regarding the latest substructure cell query in recent days. passel have been publishing a lot about this issue and it is all over the media lately. It has aggregated close to religious groups in the world and they have been very stern towards the issue.Here is my point of view regarding this issue distant other cells in our body, each of which is change to perform a particular function, Stem cells are characterized by the ability to renew themselves by the mitosis division and differentiate in to a diverse range of specialized cells types thereby offering medical treatment to wide range of debilitating diseases. This new area of bioengineering seems to be a major breakthrough with the same potential to change the health care as the discovery of antibiotics more than 70 years ago which gave hope to millions.But unfortunately this radical area of biological science has fraught with ethical issues and controversies which had made the process of development slow. There are two sources for obtaining stanch cells, iodin from the layer of cells of conceptus in the blast cyst stage, these are called the embryologic angry walk cells and the other from the giving tissues called the adult stem cells. When the stem cells are retracted from the embryo, the embryo is completely destroyed. This is where the controversies begin. According to the critics, extracting stem cells from the embryo is like killing, it is a murder. In fact some religions in the world strictly prohibit it.But I think its advantages outweigh its disadvantages. It is for the betterment of the humans and very beneficial for the society. As I feel that these stem cells have been used to save human lives and has enormous benefits. This stem cell therapy is used for the treatment of confused dreadful diseases like Parkinson disease, diabetes, Alzheimer etc which does not have any cure even in the recent days. This stem cell therapy is considered to be better than organ transplant which deliberates rise to various infections. Moreover it also give rise to other issues like availability of the donors, tissue rejection etc.Immunosuppressant drugs are given to the patients in to have downstairs gone transplant making them more vulnerable to other infectious diseases. Hence embryonic stem cells have significant medical potential and can lead to numerous social advantages. Other alternatives to embryonic stem cells are adult stem cells which are found in the normal differentiated tissues in the human body and therefore are very hard to extract. Also they are less utile as compared to the embryonic stem cells Embryo is the stage in very first few weeks of the pregnancy.That is the m when even heart of the baby hasnt been transformed. Many people feel that embryos are not same to human life as they cant still swim out of the womb, so development them cant be called killing . So I feel that killing something that is barely alive in order to save numerous human lives is onlyifiable. Therefore according to me, embryonic stem cells should be allowed for research purposes as they possess many advantages and can lead to major breakthroughs in the future. Who knows the word organ- transplant would just be history. by Makkiya Amanullah, Riyadh Saudi Arabia